By Anne Lowe
OPEN MEETINGS Business owners are accusing the City of Porterville of committing a Brown Act violation when council members approved an agreement with an Indian tribe in closed session six months ago.
In a letter dated October 13, the coalition of business owners charged the city council with approving a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the tribe in closed session, failing to mention the item on the March 16 agenda and failing to allow the public the opportunity to comment prior to the council's taking action.
The group has given the city 30 days to respond to their demands to rectify the situation.
As reported in the Porterville Recorder:
The demands are that the City:
- Issue a full report of the March 16 executive session;
- Provide any and all documents, transcripts, texts and notes related to the action taken on the MOU, to be made available to the public at the time of notice of the City Council meeting as outlined in the next item;
- Place and rehear the MOU as it was indicated to originally appear on the March 16 City Council agenda, not to exceed 60 days from the demand and provide full notice to the public and the Coalition;
- Require all City Council members in attendance on March 16 to explain their position on a number of matters.
Coalition member and local mini-mart owner, Taha Saleh, explained his position on the issue.
My main interest in this circle of events is to bring this back up and open a public discussion, then pros and cons will be made. At this time people dont understand the Memorandum of Understanding and what impact it has or if theres no negative impact. Were looking for open transparency and discussion, where people and business owners can speak the pros and cons of this deal, Saleh said.
Saleh added that prior to The Recorders publication of a story back in the month of April, he was not aware that an agreement took place in closed session.
I wasnt aware of it. What some people see as sufficient public notice may not be enough to others. There are members who have other people that are professionals who pull information and say Hey, this wasnt done right.
Among those professionals is Cheryl Schmit, founder and director of Stand Up for California a watchdog group that focuses on gambling issues affecting the state.
Schmit has been watching the Tule River Indian Tribe since 2002, when Springville residents contacted her for assistance to oppose the Tribes land acquisition near Success Lake to establish a casino.
The problem now is the Tribe is seeking to take this 40 acres into trust. The Tribe owns the land in fee and is able to expand on economic developments, but when you put a loan in trust, it creates a number of conflicts, Schmit said over a phone interview Wednesday.
Once into trust, the land becomes immediately tax exempt, taking it out of civil regulatory control, she said, giving the City and County no say and creating an atmosphere of unfair competition.
Sam Cohen, legal counsel for the Tule River Indian Tribe said the Tribe was not aware of the recent developments with regards to the alleged violation.
The City and their legal counsel will address the letter, the Tribe however is not covered by the Brown Act. The Tribe has a history of cooperating with the City, if the agreement is nullified well work with them and try to come up with a new agreement, Cohen said. Its premature to panic or start a new agreement.
As for the City, City Manager John Lollis resonated Cohens comment, saying that the City Attorney would define the response.
The City is confident there was not a Brown Act violation, Lollis said.
The Recorder was unable to contact City Counsel Julia Lew for comment as of press time.
The City Council has until November 12 to cure and correct the alleged violation.