Agency Challenge

  • califawareblog
    CalAware Challenges San Diego Supervisors’ Public Comment Ban CalAware Challenges San Diego Supervisors’ Public Comment Ban

    CalAware Challenges San Diego Supervisors’ Public Comment Ban

CalAware Challenges San Diego Supervisors’ Public Comment Ban

Stanislaus Council of Governments

February 20, 2012 Mr. Vince Harris Executive Director Stanislaus Council of Governments 1111 I Street, Suite 308 Modesto, CA 95354 RE: VIOLATIONS OF RALPH M. BROWN ACT; DEMAND FOR CURE AND CORRECTION Dear Mr. Harris, Californians Aware demands a cure and correction of repeated violations of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950 et seq.), consisting of meetings of a quorum of its Policy Board of the Stanislaus Council of Governments (StanCOG) without notice to the public or accommodation of public attendance. StanCOG, as a joint powers agency, is subject to the Brown Act with respect to the meetings of its governing body, the Policy Board. While the Policy Board comprises 16 elected officials, StanCOG’s voting members comprise only 10 public agencies—Stanislaus County and nine incorporated municipalities: Modesto, Ceres, Hughson, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Newman, Riverbank and Waterford. Of those members, the bylaws provide that six constitute a voting quorum, since six is a majority of the member agencies. Thus the presence of six mayors, for example, can permit the conduct of business, and of those six as few as four—both a majority and two thirds of those present as a bare quorum—can determine the position of the Policy Board. As it happens, six mayors—representing Modesto, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank and Waterford—constitute a “Mayors’ Working Group” which, we are reliably informed, has for months been meeting informally without notice to the public or the opportunity for public attendance, developing a ballot initiative on agricultural preservation. The effect is that a majority of the Policy Board’s voting members has been meeting out of compliance with the Brown Act to develop policy proposals for legislative action at the ballot box. This non-noticed, nonpublic process has been [...]

Bear Valley Community Service District

February 13, 2012 Mr. Rick Zanutto, President Bear Valley Community Services District 28999 South Lower Valley Road Tehachapi, CA 93561-9637 RE: RALPH M. BROWN ACT—DEMAND FOR CURE AND CORRECTION Dear Mr. Zanutto, Californians Aware demands that the Board of Directors of the Bear Valley Community Services District provide a cure and correction of multiple violations of the Ralph M. Brown Act occurring at its December 8, 2011 regular meeting. The agenda for that meeting listed, as item 4 C: “A.   REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION REGARDING PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW §54957 “TITLE: GENERAL MANAGER ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER CHIEF OF POLICE PUBLIC WORKS SUPERINTENDENT FINANCE DIRECTOR” The Brown Act, in Government Code Section 54957, states in pertinent part: (b)(1) Subject to paragraph (2), nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to prevent the legislative body of a local agency from holding closed sessions during a regular or special meeting to consider the . . . evaluation of performance . . . of a public employee . . . ***** (4) . . . Closed sessions held pursuant to this subdivision shall not include discussion or action on proposed compensation except for a reduction of compensation that results from the imposition of discipline. (Emphasis added) Included in the scope of discussion conducted in the December 8 closed session in question were employment contract terms, including compensation for the following employees: John Yeakely, General Manager Severance pay, disability compensation, salary, automobile/auto allowance, paid vacation, health and life insurance, dues and subscriptions, professional development travel and subsistence, club memberships Brown Act Demand/Bear Valley Community Services District February 13, 2012 Page 2 of 3 Sandra L. Jantzen, District Secretary/Assistant General Manager Severance pay, disability compensation, salary, health and life insurance, [...]

City of Aliso Viejo

May 15, 2011 SENT BY ELECTRONIC AND POSTAL MAIL RE: Recreation Committee and the Brown Act DEMAND FOR CORRECTION Honorable Carmen Cave, Mayor City of Aliso Viejo 12 Journey, Suite 100 Aliso Viejo, CA 92656-5335 Dear Mayor Cave, This letter is to caution you that the “Recreation Ad Hoc Committee” created by the City Council at its April 15, 2009 meeting is a legislative body required to comply with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950 et seq.). The Act in Section 54952 states: As used in this chapter, “legislative body” means: ***** (b) A commission, committee, board, or other body of a local agency, whether permanent or temporary, decisionmaking or advisory, created by charter, ordinance, resolution, or formal action of a legislative body. . . advisory committees, composed solely of the members of the legislative body that are less than a quorum of the legislative body are not legislative bodies, except that standing committees of a legislative body, irrespective of their composition, which have a continuing subject matter jurisdiction, or a meeting schedule fixed by charter, ordinance, resolution, or formal action of a legislative body are legislative bodies for purposes of this chapter . The “Recreation Ad Hoc Committee,” despite the words “Ad Hoc,” is a standing committee having been given a continuing area of subject matter jurisdiction without a terminal point in terms of either date or task accomplishment. As reflected in the minutes of the April 1, 2009 meeting of the Council, you (then a Council Member) suggested Council agendize the establishment of an ad hoc committee to conduct a needs analysis for recreational services in the City and the use of park improvement bonds and community enhancement fees for next [...]